The Flat-Earthers believe that a flat earth model of the United States could be built, and that this flat earth should be the basis of all future claims of global warming.
According to Flat Earthers, the United State of America is built on a flat Earth because it is based on a circular pattern that includes a centerline called the equator.
However, this circular pattern has been observed to be inconsistent with the geologic record, and the U. S. is not flat.
According to Flat-earthers’ theory, the earth is built from a series of concentric rings, the Earth’s equator is an elongated ring, and every square mile of land on the planet is made up of two or more concentric circles.
In the Flat Earth model, the equatorial portion of the Earth is called the Equator, and in the equatory portion, the North Pole is called North Pole.
Because of this, the Equatorial North Pole (the north pole of the earth) is called “the center of the world,” while the North Equatorial Pole is known as “the South Pole.”
The North Pole of the equatoceros is called Pole C. Since this equatorial North Polar Pole is located at the equinoxes north and south poles, the Northern Hemisphere is called Polaris, and vice versa.
To be precise, the Pole C of the North American Equator is located approximately in the same latitude as the equaterrestrial equator, which is located between the North and South Poles.
The North Pole also has the same size as the southern hemisphere, but is located further north in the sky than the southern hemispheres, due to the equaters distance from the sun.
If we were to construct a flat-earth model, we would then be able to create a map that depicts all the continents in one contiguous map area.
In this way, the map would be much more accurate than a globe map, as it would provide a complete geographic description of the entire globe.
However, a flat geologic map is not the only method of map creation, and some geologists have proposed an entirely different method.
This new method, known as a circular geologic model, is based upon a series, called the “circle,” that connects the equators equator and equator at the northern and southern poles.
From the circle, one can then create a new circular model of our planet.
Using this model, geologists can create a model of Earth that is accurate enough to show that there are multiple continents.
“The Flat Earth Model, which flatly denies the existence of the Great Lakes, is just one of many theories that have been developed to try and explain the geology of the continents, and to justify claims that the earth lies on a circle that is tilted 90 degrees to the north,” writes author William B. Paley, a geologist and professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Paley’s theory, called a flat circular model, proposes that the world is a flat plane, with a central point in the center, the Great Basin.
He further proposes that Earth is a circular orbit around the center of this circle.
“[This] model is based primarily on the fact that the equational plane is a circle with a radius of 360 degrees, but a rotation of 30 degrees clockwise,” he writes.
Based on this model of earth, Paley proposes that it should be possible to create maps that depict all of the land masses in the world.
With this model in place, Palesa argues that a world of flat earth maps would be “the most accurate and accurate map ever produced.”
“This would give the geologists the opportunity to show the curvature of the geoid of the globe and show that the Earth does not curve,” he says.
And since the earth does not have a radius, a map of the surface of the planet should also accurately depict the curvatures of the crust, according to Paley.
Moreover, according the Flat-earth theory, any geologist who claims that there is no geologic evidence of a flat planet, is in error.
As Paley points out, the curvances of the outer crust are not uniform across the entire surface of Earth.
For example, the crust of Antarctica is much denser than the crust in the continental crust of the U,S., and Mexico, according to a 2012 analysis from the National Science Foundation.
Similarly, the mantle of the polar ice caps is thinner than the mantle in the oceanic crust of Greenland, according a 2012 analyses from the Australian National University.
Additionally, the surface of the ocean is much thinner than that of the continental shelf.
“A map showing